Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter English's avatar

The NHS is and had always been incredibly efficient. Some misguided attempts to make it more efficient have backfired badly, but it still remains very efficient, although its quality has deteriorated as a result of decades of underfunding. Introducing a private insurance system would mean vast amounts of money being diverted away from healthcare, and into bureaucracy and the pockets of investors. Has Rosindell seen any US healthcare bills? Or even German ones, come to that? Taxpayers may see lower tax increases if universal healthcare is no longer covered; but their outgoings will increase massively as they'll have to pay many times more on insurance. I assume Rosindell either stands to gain directly, or via donors who are paying him to increase their profits.

Jacky Smith's avatar

Looks like the tide's going out on RefUK, doesn't it?

Watching the polls with interest.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?